A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/039273.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 289: Generator Expressions (second draft)

[Python-Dev] PEP 289: Generator Expressions (second draft) [Python-Dev] PEP 289: Generator Expressions (second draft)Jeremy Fincher fincher.8 at osu.edu
Wed Oct 22 05:45:48 EDT 2003
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 03:57 am, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Accordingly, generator expressions are expected to partially eliminate
> the need for reduce() which is notorious for its lack of clarity. And,
> there are additional speed and clarity benefits from writing expressions
> directly instead of using lambda.

I probably missed it in this monster of a thread, but how do generator 
expressions do this?  It seems that they'd only make reduce more efficient, 
but it would still be just as needed as before.

Jeremy

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4