On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 23:34, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 23:00, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > > > I would prefer to see a separate statement similar to global that meant > > "look for the nearest enclosing binding." Rather than specifying that > > you want to use x from outer, you could only say you don't want x to be > > local. That means you'd always get intermediate. > > Would those "up" bindings chain? Yes. If a block had an up declaration and it contained a nested block with an up declaration for the same variable, both blocks would refer to an outer binding. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4