A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/039163.html below:

[Python-Dev] listcomps vs. for loops

[Python-Dev] listcomps vs. for loops [Python-Dev] listcomps vs. for loopsAahz aahz at pythoncraft.com
Tue Oct 21 14:57:49 EDT 2003
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> It's only list comprehensions where I plan to remove x from the scope
> after the comprehension is finished.
> 
> Do you need a warning for that change too?  Code that relies on it is
> pretty sick IMO.

Yes, it's sick, but since you made clear previously that listcomps
semantics equivalent to the corresponding for loop, I wouldn't be
surprised to discover that someone converted a for loop to a listcomp
without fixing that sickness.  So yes, it needs a warning.
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code."
--Bill Harlan

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4