> From: "Martin v. Löwis" [mailto:martin at v.loewis.de] > > Delaney, Timothy C (Timothy) wrote: > > > Perhaps a comment that the patch won't be accepted until > the dead code > > has been removed, but that the dead code is there for ease > of regression > > testing during the initial testing period? > > OTOH, the patch has been already committed to CVS head. So it > is already accepted. True. Too many different bug tracking and source control systems ... I think it would be very useful (and important) to document this requirement though - perhaps a separate bug report, with a comment on the patch pointing to it? Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4