Alex Martelli <aleaxit at yahoo.com> writes: > On Saturday 18 October 2003 12:46 am, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > ... >> My misgivings about drop() and take() are, firstly, that they >> are expressible in-terms of islice() so they don't really add >> any new capability. Secondly, the number of tools needs to be > > True. I gotta remember that -- I find it unintuitive, maybe it's > islice's odious range-like ordering of arguments. Yes, that rubs me the wrong way too. That and I always read it is-lice (and imap always makes me think of mail...). Cheers, mwh -- Need to Know is usually an interesting UK digest of things that happened last week or might happen next week. [...] This week, nothing happened, and we don't care. -- NTK Now, 2000-12-29, http://www.ntk.net/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4