Alex Martelli strung bits together to say: > On Monday 20 October 2003 06:44 am, Greg Ewing wrote: > ... > >>So, taking the original accumulator display idea, and >>incorporating some of the ideas that have come up along >>the way, such as getting rid of the square brackets, >>how about >> >> sum of x*x for x in xvalues >> average of g for g in grades >> maximum of f(x, y) for x in xrange for y in yrange >> top(10) of humour(joke) for joke in comedy > > > Wow. > > I'm speechless. > > [later, having recovered speech] IF (big if) we could pull THAT off, it > WOULD be well worth making 'of' a keyword (and thus requiring a > "from __future__ import"). It's SO beautiful, SO pythonic, the only > risk I can see is that we'd have newbie people coding: > sum of the_values > rather than: > sum(the_values) > or: > sum of x for x in the_values Except, if it was defined such that you wrote: sum of [x*x for x in the_values] then: sum of the_values would actually be a valid expression, and Greg's examples would become: sum of xvalues average of grades maximum of [f(x, y) for x in xrange for y in yrange] top(10) of [humour(joke) for joke in comedy] Either way, that's some seriously pretty executable psuedocode he has happening! And a magic method "__of__" that takes a list as an argument might be enough to do the trick, too. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | Brisbane, Australia ICQ#: 68854767 | ncoghlan at email.com Mobile: 0409 573 268 | http://www.talkinboutstuff.net "Let go your prejudices, lest they limit your thoughts and actions."
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4