RetroSearch Browse

Sun Oct 19 20:08:31 EDT 2003 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/039036.html

"Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com>:

> If you look at it this way, then you can consider [x for x in S] to be 
> shorthand syntax for list(x for x in S), as they would both produce the 
> same result.  However, IIRC, the current listcomp implementation actually 
> binds 'x' in the current local namespace, whereas the generator version 
> would not.

Are we sure about that?

Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.  |
greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/039036.html below:

[Python-Dev] accumulator display syntax