Guido: > but perhaps we can make this work: > > sum(x for x in S) But if "x for x in S" were a legal expression on its own, returning a generator, then [x for x in S] would have to be a 1-element list containing a generator. Unless you're suggesting that it should be a special feature of the function call syntax? That would be bizarre... Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4