[Gustavo] > > > > I'm shocked. Do you really belive that I've done all the changes and > > past fixes in SRE without knowing how it works? I thought my > > credibility was a little higher. > [Martin] > I was relying on your credibility, so I was surprised that you are > interested to leave the old code in - that suggests that you feel > there are problems with your code. I'm trying to find out what you > think these problems are. > > However, getting all trust in the SRE code from the trust that I have > in you is not enough for me - and, PLEASE UNDERSTAND, this has nothing > to do with you personally. I feel bad if important code is so > unmaintainable that only a single person understands it. I made the > remark as a comment to you saying > > "let's please wait a little bit to see the new code working?" > > which suggested that we actually have to *see* how the code works, in > order to determine whether it works. > Martin: I suspect that Gustavo is suffering for an excess of care and modesty: after all, with CVS controlling the code it isn't hard to back out a patch if it turns out to be a bad idea. But it won't, will it, Gustavo ;-)? regards -- Steve Holden +1 703 278 8281 http://www.holdenweb.com/ Improve the Internet http://vancouver-webpages.com/CacheNow/ Python Web Programming http://pydish.holdenweb.com/pwp/ Interview with GvR August 14, 2003 http://www.onlamp.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4