Gustavo Niemeyer <niemeyer at conectiva.com> writes: > Hey.. Martin, are you ok? What's going on? You're being extremelly > aggressive without an aparent reason. I'm putting a prize on my head > for hacking the *hairy* code in SRE and removing a serious limitation, > and that's your reaction!? I'm disappointed. Please accept my apologies; I don't want to diminish your efforts, and I do appreciate them. However, I'm concerned that track is completely lost as to how SRE works - is it or is it not the case that the current implementation which is in CVS is recursive, with arbitrary deep nesting? If it is not recursive anymore (which the subject suggests), then why is the is the 'level' argument still in? Can we or can we not remove the ad-hoc determination of USE_RECURSION_LIMIT? > Yeah.. I can clean it. let's please wait a little bit to > see the new code working? Certainly. However, I was hoping that we have better means of finding out whether the code still does what it is supposed to do than testing. Perhaps that is an illusion. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4