> > I think the application area is too narrow to warrant a built-in, > > *and* lists shouldn't grow two similar methods. Let's keep the > > language small! > > Not to be hard headed here, but if dropped now, it will never > be considered again. Did you have a chance to look at the > rationale for change in my previous note and added in the > comments for the patch? I think they offer some examples > and reasons stronger than "saving a little typing": > www.python.org/sf/825814 I'm taking that into account. It still smells funny. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4