A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/038980.html below:

[Python-Dev] in-line sort

[Python-Dev] in-line sort [Python-Dev] in-line sortGuido van Rossum guido at python.org
Sat Oct 18 15:35:19 EDT 2003
> > I think the application area is too narrow to warrant a built-in,
> > *and* lists shouldn't grow two similar methods.  Let's keep the
> > language small!
> 
> Not to be hard headed here, but if dropped now, it will never
> be considered again.  Did you have a chance to look at the 
> rationale for change in my previous note and added in the
> comments for the patch?  I think they offer some examples 
> and reasons stronger than "saving a little typing":  
>       www.python.org/sf/825814

I'm taking that into account.  It still smells funny.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4