Aahz wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2003, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >>Raymond: >> >>>FWIW, I've posted a patch to implement list.copysort() that >>>includes a news announcement, docs, and unittests: >> >>Despite my suggesting a better name, I'm not in favor of this (let's >>say -0). > > > I'm actually -1, particularly with your clear argument; I just didn't > like your suggestion of l.sorted(). I'm -1 as well. Lists do not need to grow a method for something that only replaces two lines of code that are not tricky in any form of the word. -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4