On Fri, Oct 17, 2003, Guido van Rossum wrote: >Raymond: >> >> FWIW, I've posted a patch to implement list.copysort() that >> includes a news announcement, docs, and unittests: > > Despite my suggesting a better name, I'm not in favor of this (let's > say -0). I'm actually -1, particularly with your clear argument; I just didn't like your suggestion of l.sorted(). -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code." --Bill Harlan
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4