> Along with that confusion, (x*x for x in S) would look like a tuple > comprehension, rather than a bare iterator. Well, () is already heavily overloaded, so I can live with that. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4