> But, indexing does stretch quite > far in the current Python syntax and semantics (in Python's > *pragmatics* you're supposed to use it far more restrainedly). Which is why I didn't like the 'sum[x for x in S]' notation much. Let's look for an in-line generator notation instead. I like sum((yield x for x in S)) but perhaps we can make this work: sum(x for x in S) (Somebody posted a whole bunch of alternatives that were mostly picking random delimiters; it didn't look like the right approach.) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4