A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/038860.html below:

list.sort, was Re: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate

list.sort, was Re: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate list.sort, was Re: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorateSkip Montanaro skip at pobox.com
Fri Oct 17 12:13:37 EDT 2003
    >> If anything at all, i'd suggest a std-module which contains e.g. 
    >> 'sort', 'reverse' and 'extend' functions which always return
    >> a new list, so that you could write:
    >> 
    >> for i in reverse(somelist):
    >> ...

    Gustavo> You can do reverse with [::-1] now.

I don't think that is considered "stable" in the sorting sense.  If I sort
in descending order vs ascending order, they are not mere reversals of each
other.  I may well still want adjacent records whose sort keys are
identical to remain in the same order.

What will the new reverse=True keyword arg do?

Skip

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4