>> If anything at all, i'd suggest a std-module which contains e.g. >> 'sort', 'reverse' and 'extend' functions which always return >> a new list, so that you could write: >> >> for i in reverse(somelist): >> ... Gustavo> You can do reverse with [::-1] now. I don't think that is considered "stable" in the sorting sense. If I sort in descending order vs ascending order, they are not mere reversals of each other. I may well still want adjacent records whose sort keys are identical to remain in the same order. What will the new reverse=True keyword arg do? Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4