[Guido van Rossum] > > *If* we're going to consider this, I would recommend using a different > > method name rather than a keyword argument. Arguments whose value > > changes the return type present a problem for program analysis tools > > like type checkers (and IMO are also easily overseen by human > > readers). And, it's easier to write l.sorted() rather than > > l.sort(inline=True). [Aahz] > Let's make explicit: l.copysort() > > I'm not a big fan of grammatical suffixes for distinguishing between > similar meanings. +1 Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4