RetroSearch Browse

Wed Oct 15 12:51:14 EDT 2003 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/038761.html

> How about making it "-2", then, as the previous (broken) package
> would have been "-1".  Some might assume "Python-2.3.2.exe" and
> "Python-2.3.2-1.exe" were identical, but I would think few would
> make that assumption with "Python-2.3.2.exe" and
> "Python-2.3.2-2.exe".

Haven't you noticed that Python uses 0-based indexing? :-)

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/038761.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python-2.3.2 windows binary screwed