Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Why not use a special tuple type for the DSU algorithm that ignores > > its last element when doing a comparison? It eliminates the problem > > of creating a zillion int objects, and <speculation>it would be > > easy to implement.</speculation> > > If we're going to do a custom object, it should be a fixed-length > struct containing (1) the key, (2) a C int of sufficient size to hold > the record index; (3) a pointer to the record, and its comparison > should only use (1) and (2). But since we have a stable sort, (2) can be omitted. I agree with Neil that this is a very clever idea! Just
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4