Guido van Rossum wrote: > Given that internally we still do a DSU, sorting tuples of (key, > something), using the id of the record for 'something' is just as > inefficient as using the original index -- in both cases we'd have to > allocate len(lst) ints. > > Greg Ewing suggested that the ints shouldn't have to be Python ints. > While this is true, it would require a much larger overhaul of the > existing sort code, which assumes the "records" to be sorted are > pointers to objects. Why not use a special tuple type for the DSU algorithm that ignores its last element when doing a comparison? It eliminates the problem of creating a zillion int objects, and <speculation>it would be easy to implement.</speculation> jw
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4