[Guido van Rossum] > After reading this exchange, I'm not sure I agree with Tim about the > importance of avoiding to compare the full records. It could be useful to avoid comparing the full records. Once in a while, I have the problem of comparing objects which are not comparable to start with, and have to choose between making them comparable, or using decoration for the time of the sort in which there is a guarantee that the object themselves will not be used in comparisons (by ensuring decoration keys never compare equal). The third option, providing a comparison function, is something I succeeded to avoid so far, as it seems to me that this is a good habit relying on fast idioms at hand, instead of on speed-impacting formulations, and good habits are best kept by sticking to them. :-) The problem at making objects comparable is that you fix a preferred or "natural" ordering for the objects, which might not be so "natural" when you need to sort them differently. In some circumstances, maybe many of them, it is significantly cleaner to leave the objects as not comparable. -- François Pinard http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4