> Guido: > > > [s for s in lst sortby s.lower()] > > > > It suffers IMO from the "SQL syndrome": having reserved words to the > > language that are only meaningful in a very specific syntax yet are > > reserved everywhere. [Greg] > It could probably be a non-reserved keyword in this case. Yes, but that would be error-prone, because to the parser it would hve to look like an expression followed by an identifier followed by another expression. Many typos in the first expression can then turn this into a valid but different expression. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4