Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> writes: > Maybe PyBool_FromLong() itself could make this unneeded by adding > something like > > if (ok < 0 && PyErr_Occurred()) > return NULL; > > to its start? That would an incompatible change. I would expect PyBool_FromLong(i) do the same thing as bool(i). > Maybe a pair of macros Py_return_True and Py_return_False would make > sense? You should, of course, add Py_return_None to it, as well. Then you will find that some contributor goes on a crusade to use these throughout very quickly :-) Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4