RetroSearch Browse

Thu Oct 9 00:17:55 EDT 2003 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/038607.html

Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>:

> Maybe PyBool_FromLong() itself could make this unneeded by adding
> something like
> 
>     if (ok < 0 && PyErr_Occurred())
>         return NULL;
> 
> to its start?

Not sure if it would be a good idea to encourage reliance
on one API function doing error checking on behalf of others.
I can see someone coming along later and adding some code
in between whatever returned the result and the PyBool_FromLong
call, not realising that doing so would upset the error
checking.

Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.  |
greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/038607.html below:

[Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Objects typeobject.c, 2.244, 2.245