"Gregory P. Smith" <greg at electricrain.com>: > At the time the TypeError is constructed it shouldn't add serious overhead > to check if its a method or a function and subtract 1 accordingly. Except that by the time the error is detected, we've lost track of whether it's a method or not. Maybe a heuristic could be applied, e.g. if the first parameter is called 'self', say something like "foo() takes exactly 1 argument (excluding 'self'), 0 given". Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4