RetroSearch Browse

Wed Oct 8 00:03:04 EDT 2003 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/038584.html

On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 22:22, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> Barry Warsaw writes:
>  > Unfortunately, Mail-Followup-To is neither standard nor widely
>  > implemented in mail readers.  Too bad, it's a good idea.
> 
> There'd be more motivation for mailers to support it if lists
> generated it.  Add it to Mailman, and you'll give mailer
> authors/maintainers another reason to support it.  ;-)

Yeah, we've tried that with the RFC 2369 (List-*) headers for years and
it hasn't seemed to work.  Besides, the closest thing to a standard for
Mail-Followup-To says that list servers should never set the header[1]. 
I support your efforts to fight the good fight though, by setting your
MUA to add those headers. :)

-Barry

[1] http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20031008/2b8c66f5/attachment.bin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/038584.html below:

spambayes-checkins -> spambayes-dev, python-checkins -> python-dev