RetroSearch Browse

Tue Oct 7 11:46:51 EDT 2003 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/038569.html

On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 11:01, Kenny Pitt wrote:
> Barry Warsaw wrote:

> > IMO as an anti-Reply-to munger, I think this is one situation where
> > Reply-To hacking is perfectly legit.  You don't want discussions on
> > -checkins, you want them on the discuss mailing list (in this case
> > spambayes-dev).  MM2.1 can be configured to retain any existing
> > Reply-To fields so people who have to set this to worm around their
> > broken mail systems can still be coddled.
> > 
> > python-devers and spambayes-devers, you vant I should do dis?
> > -Barry
> 
> +1

Done for both lists.
-Barry

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/038569.html below:

[spambayes-dev] spambayes-checkins -> spambayes-dev,python-checkins -> python-dev