Tim Peters writes: > Fred, do we have stats on how often each of the files got downloaded for > previous releases? No, but we should be able to pull those from the server logs. Maybe this weekend I'll get time to write a script to pull that data out. Tom Emerson writes: > I wouldn't switch to bz2. Even tgz can be confusing. Having .zip files > for Windows users and .tar.gz files for Unix users is a happy medium > that should work most everywhere. Interesting. bzip2 saves half a MB over gzip for the HTML and PostScript formats. What reason do you have for not using bzip2? It was very heavily requested for the file-size advantage. > Of course for maximum Unix > portability I suppose you could use .tar.Z ;-) Except nobody remembers what to do with those anymore. ;-) I haven't used compress/uncompress in *many* years. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fred at zope.com> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4