From: Barry Warsaw [mailto:barry at python.org] > On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 02:10, Anthony Baxter wrote: > > Just another thought - should the newer pybsddb API be folded into the > > library docs? > They're big, but I think worth it. In general the pybsddb docs are > excellent and invaluable [...] I think it should. I read the bsddb stuff in the Python manual, and barely noticed the reference to pybsddb. Subconsciously, I assumed that it was simply background reading, and not important for day to day use (much like pointers to RFCs in many of the Internet modules). I certainly never assumed that there might be functionality which wasn't documented in the Python library reference. Paul.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4