A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-November/040416.html below:

[Python-Dev] Time for 2.3.3?

[Python-Dev] Time for 2.3.3? [Python-Dev] Time for 2.3.3?Michael Hudson mwh at python.net
Mon Nov 24 05:53:42 EST 2003
Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> writes:

>>>> Michael Hudson wrote
>> We should give the new autoconf a go, at least.
>
> I would strongly prefer to do this sooner than later, so I was thinking
> of doing the upgrade sometime this week. Does anyone have/know any 
> reasons to not upgrade to the newer autoconf?

Well, there was an almost instananeous brown-paper-bag 2.59 release,
but I don't know of any problems with 2.59.  Not sure I would if there
were, mind.

> It should fix a bunch of build annoyances (and I can get rid of
> aclocal.m4)

That's the motivation :-)

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  Make this IDLE version 0.8.  (We have to skip 0.7 because that 
  was a CNRI release in a corner of the basement of a government 
  building on a planet circling Aldebaran.)
                             -- Guido Van Rossum, in a checkin comment

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4