Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> writes: >>>> Michael Hudson wrote >> We should give the new autoconf a go, at least. > > I would strongly prefer to do this sooner than later, so I was thinking > of doing the upgrade sometime this week. Does anyone have/know any > reasons to not upgrade to the newer autoconf? Well, there was an almost instananeous brown-paper-bag 2.59 release, but I don't know of any problems with 2.59. Not sure I would if there were, mind. > It should fix a bunch of build annoyances (and I can get rid of > aclocal.m4) That's the motivation :-) Cheers, mwh -- Make this IDLE version 0.8. (We have to skip 0.7 because that was a CNRI release in a corner of the basement of a government building on a planet circling Aldebaran.) -- Guido Van Rossum, in a checkin comment
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4