[Tim, on <http://www.python.org/sf/843455?] > ... > I haven't yet been able to convince myself that the following does or > does not have a slow memory leak after the patch ... It doesn't -- when I got up today, it was still chugging along, and was using less memory than when I went to sleep. If it weren't for that I was running it on a Win98SE box, we could conclude that cyclic trash is now collected faster than it's generated <wink>.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4