> As of Python 2.3, list.sort() *is* stable, but we're told not to > rely on that behavior. [1] In particular, it might change for > future versions/alternate implementations of Python. You missed Guido's pronouncement on this issue: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/038773.html The bottom line is: "OK, I pronounce on this: Python's list.sort() shall be stable." Cheers, Brian
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4