Dan Sugalski writes: > Digits change for Unicode as well. Plus they get potentially... > interesting in some cases, where the digit-ness of a character is arguably > contextually driven, but I think that can be ignored. Most of the time, at > least. That depends on how we define "digits" for this purpose. I've always thought of the *digits strings as true constants; other may disagree. I understand that the digit-ness of a Unicode character is defined in more interesting ways than simply the ASCII characters 0-9. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4