Guido van Rossum wrote: > I have too much on my plate (spent too much on generator expressions > lately :-). > > I am bowing out of the variable substitution discussion after noting > that putting it in a module would be a great start (like for sets). > This idea seemed to die for no apparent reason. Fred, Skip, and Barry all liked the idea of adding the string substitution code to a module (one idea for a name was textutils) and Guido obviously seems receptive to the idea. Do people feel like moving forward with a new module? -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4