> Hm, I'd forgotten about ascii_letters. It would make a beautiful > class attribute of str. The problem with ascii_letters is that it is not constant. Depending on the startup, it can optionally replace the usual definition with that provided by strop.lowercase. > I *do* think that we don't need string.letters -- the only use for it > I've seen is checking if a character is in that string, and > c.isletter() is faster. But if someone has a use case for it that > isn't argued away, I'd be okay with seeing it reincarnated as a class > attribute of str too. I had C coded a patch for a whole group of str.isSomething tests. The only thing that held it up was my not finding time to figure out how to exactly the same thing for Unicode objects. Maybe someone can pick-up the patch: www.python.org/sf/562501 Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4