On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 10:24, Alex Martelli wrote: > We must keep supporting that approach, yes (alas), but maybe it's > not too late to encourage another alternative style instead? E.g., have > some object exposing attributes corresponding to those strings that > do name codecs, so that while e.g. > > s.encode('zlib', level=9) > > would have to keep working, the officially encouraged style would be: > > s.encode(codec.zlib, level=9) > > or something of that ilk...? If s.encode(codec.notacodec, level=9) throws an AttributeError, then +1. Add that to the original idea and +1 all around. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4