A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-November/040059.html below:

[Python-Dev] check-in policy, trunk vs maintenance branch

[Python-Dev] check-in policy, trunk vs maintenance branch [Python-Dev] check-in policy, trunk vs maintenance branchAahz aahz at pythoncraft.com
Fri Nov 7 09:59:34 EST 2003
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003, Jack Jansen wrote:
>
> Is it okay to apply fixes to the branch only when I know the relevant 
> portions of the trunk will disappear before 2.4?

I'd say not.  That's the same reasoning Alex used, and I think that any
exceptions made will only lead to trouble later.  What happens if you
get hit by a beer truck and the 2.4 changes don't get made?
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code."
--Bill Harlan

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4