On 3 Nov 2003, at 15:01, Aahz wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003, Alex Martelli wrote: >> >> I made a few bugfix check-ins to the 2.3 maintenance branch this >> weekend and Michael Hudson commented that he thinks that so doing is a >> bad idea, that bug fixes should filter from the 2.4 trunk to the 2.3 >> branch and not the other way around. Is this indeed the policy (have >> I missed some guidelines about it)? > > PEP 6: > > As individual patches get contributed to the feature release fork, > each patch contributor is requested to consider whether the patch > is > a bug fix suitable for inclusion in a patch release. If the patch > is > considered suitable, the patch contributor will mail the > SourceForge > patch (bug fix?) number to the maintainers' mailing list. Is it okay to apply fixes to the branch only when I know the relevant portions of the trunk will disappear before 2.4? I've done some fixes to the MacPython IDE that I did only on the release23-maint branch, because the plan is that the IDE will be replaced by something completely different soon... -- Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen at cwi.nl> http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4