> Among the comp.lang.python crowd, nearly everyone supported some form of > the PEP (with varying preferences on the name or where to put it). The > community participation rate was high with about 120 posts across four > threads contributing to hammering out the current version of the pep. How many participants in those 120 posts? (I recall a thread where one individual posted 100 messages. :-) > Is there anything else that needs to be done in the way of research, > voting, or cheerleading for pep to be accepted? Yes. I'm getting cold feet about __reversed__. Some folks seem to think that reversed() can be made to work on many iterators by having the iterator supply __reversed__; I think this is asking for trouble (e.g. you already pointed out why it couldn't be done for enumerate()). I also still think that a reversed [x]range() would give us a bigger bang for the buck -- less bang, but also a lot less bucks. :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4