> From: Alex Martelli [mailto:aleaxit at yahoo.com]
>
> or reversed(enumerate(seq)) if the index IS needed.
Hmm - wouldn't this give an iterator that returned two values - an iterable for the seq, and an iterable for the indexes of seq?
I would think this would need to be:
reversed(*enumerate(seq))
with the presumption being that reversed would reverse each parameter and return them in lockstep.
Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4