>>> Alex Martelli wrote > The bug that this is testing for has gone away: the re engine doesn't > stack overflow on this any more. The tests have been updated in 2.4 > but not on the 2.3 branch. I mentioned that and asked whether I should > just update the 2.3 tests, but apparently the concept is that this should > rather be done by whoever fixed the bug, instead (or during the backport > phase to prepare 2.3.3). Hm. I must have mis-spoken. If you see a bugfix that should go on the branch but hasn't, please feel completely free to do the backport. I have a mail folder with -checkins messages that need to be checked for backportage, but I only get to this periodically (and not at all in the last couple of weeks, alas). I do plan to clear this out sometime this week... Anthony -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4