Hello Michael, On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:35:05AM +0000, Michael Hudson wrote: > > "Not easy" would have been more appropriate. It is still basically what > > malloc() does. > > Well, yeah, but as Tim said pymalloc gets its wins from assuming that > each allocation is the same size. You could combine my idea with some > other allocation scheme, certainly, but given the relative paucity of > variable length types and the reduction in allocator overhead using > something like pymalloc gives us, I think it might just be easier to > not do them any more. Of course, I don't see myself having any time > to play with this idea any time soon, and it's probably not really > beefy enough to get a masters thesis from, so maybe we'll never know. Ok. I expect it to be much easier to experiment with with PyPy anyway. Armin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4