[Raymond Hettinger] > Okay, you've had a second review on the patch and backporting > to 2.2.3 is reasonable. Please add a news item for the two changes > in behavior. I'll wait for Fred to get back. I'm not sure you've used weakrefs <wink>. > BTW, I wasn't trying to be difficult, I was starting from the > presumption that Fred wasn't smoking dope when he put in that weird > block of code. Looks like the presumption was wrong ;-) That's cool, I started from them same presumption, and am still not entirely over it -- it was such an outrageously inefficient way to delete a key that the suspicion still nags there was *some* reason for it (other than really good dope <wink>).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4