Jack Jansen wrote: > > Oops, that suddenly went *very* fast, I though I had until the weekend... But probably not as fast as it should have. I had fun reading checkin comments like (paraphrasing), "this change is probably important enough for a 2.2.3 release" dated from December of last year. :) > Is there a chance I could get #723495 still in before 2.2.3 final? I was > also hoping to find a fix for #571343, but I don't have a patch yet > (although I'll try to get one up in the next few hours). I think it would be fine to get these into 2.2.3 final. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4