Not so simple after all, or maybe too simple. My 'simple' largedict test was simplistic and flawed, and a more thorough test shows a slowdown on large dicts. I was inserting, accessing, and deleting the keys without randomising the order, and once randomised, cache effects kicked in. The slowdown isnt too huge though. Further testing against small dicts shows a much larger slowdown. The 5% improvement in pystone results still stands, but I think the main reason for the improvement is that I had inlined some fail-fast tests into ceval.c Oh well, back to the drawing board.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4