On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 14:44, Barry Warsaw wrote: > No, it's not, and in 2.3 you get an error (albeit a TypeError with a > rather unhelpful message). I guess the "fix" hasn't been backported. I think we decided this wasn't a pure bugfix :-). Some poor soul may have code that relies on being able to subclass a module. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4