On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 14:36, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote: > Here's a strange case we just ran across, led along by a typo in an > import statement. This is using the head of the 2.2.x maintenance > branch; I've not tested this against the trunk yet. > > >>> import os > >>> class Foo(os): > ... pass > ... > >>> Foo > <module '?' (built-in)> > > I suspect this isn't intentional behavior. ;-) No, it's not, and in 2.3 you get an error (albeit a TypeError with a rather unhelpful message). I guess the "fix" hasn't been backported. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4