A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-May/035609.html below:

[Python-Dev] Inplace multiply

[Python-Dev] Inplace multiply [Python-Dev] Inplace multiplyMichael Hudson mwh@python.net
Wed, 14 May 2003 10:53:04 +0100
"Paul Dubois" <paul@pfdubois.com> writes:

> My "masked array" class MA has a problem that I don't know how to solve. The
> inplace multiply function
>
>     def __imul__ (self, other)
>
> is not getting called while my other input operations do work. The scenario
> is
>
> x = MA.array(...)
>
> x *= c
>
> If c is an int, this works correctly, calling MA.__imul__. Otherwise, I get
> a message from the Python runtime saying it can't multiply a sequence by a
> non-int. But change MA to Numeric, it works.
>
> Numeric is an extension type and MA is a (new style) class. MA defines
> __len__ as well as all the math operators.

What version of Python?  This smells like a bug that has been
(thought) fixed.

Cheers,
M.

-- 
  The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit.
                                                -- W. Somerset Maugham



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4