Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-May/035600.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 2.3b1 _XOPEN_SOURCE value from configure.in

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 2.3b1 _XOPEN_SOURCE value from configure.in
• Next message: [Python-Dev] os.path.walk() lacks 'depth first' option
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> writes:

> Defining __EXTENSIONS__ could also help. IIRC it works just like
> _GNU_SOURCE/_NETBSD_SOURCE.

We do define __EXTENSIONS__, this is not the issue. We define
_XOPEN_SOURCE to 600 on all systems, because that is the highest value
specified by any X/Open spec today. The system may not support all of
the latest Posix features; this is not problem because we
autoconfiscate them.

The problem really only occurs if somebody thinks they need to define
_XOPEN_SOURCE to some other value; the compiler will then complain.

Regards,
Martin

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 2.3b1 _XOPEN_SOURCE value from configure.in
• Next message: [Python-Dev] os.path.walk() lacks 'depth first' option
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4