Samuele Pedroni <pedronis@bluewin.ch> writes:
> 1)
>
> Python 2.3b1 (#40, Apr 25 2003, 19:06:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] on win32
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
> >>> import codeop
> >>> codeop.compile_command("",symbol="eval")
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
> File "s:\transit\py23\lib\codeop.py", line 129, in compile_command
> return _maybe_compile(_compile, source, filename, symbol)
> File "s:\transit\py23\lib\codeop.py", line 106, in _maybe_compile
> raise SyntaxError, err1
> File "<input>", line 1
> pass
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>
>
> the error is basically an artifact of the logic that enforces:
>
> compile_command("",symbol="single") === compile_command("pass",symbol="single")
>
> (this makes typing enter immediately after the prompt at a simulated
> shell a nop as expected)
>
> I would expect
>
> compile_command("",symbol="eval")
>
> to return None, i.e. to simply signal an incomplete expression (that
> is what would happen if the code for "eval" case would avoid the cited
> logic).
OK, but I think you should preserve the existing behaviour for
symbol="single".
Cheers,
M.
--
I also feel it essential to note, [...], that Description Logics,
non-Monotonic Logics, Default Logics and Circumscription Logics
can all collectively go suck a cow. Thank you.
-- http://advogato.org/person/Johnath/diary.html?start=4
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4